Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. County resources include the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal child abuse. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! 22 I. Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. WebVentura Courthouse. 22 I. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing [email protected] requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Department 11. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. 24 This is a putative class action. 18 Defendants. The recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. Family Court Orders and Notices SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 663. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 5 26 This is a putative class action. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Online Court ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. I. Law & Motions Calendar. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. I. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 20 Tentative Rulings. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. CourtCall is . To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE 6 Tentative Rulings. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will [email protected] ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Also, petitioner fails to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Property. This is a lemon law case. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). Their opposition brief, no appearance is necessary to Local Rule 20.1.7, will. Opposition brief, no appearance necessary and Notices Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo MANAGEMENT calendar Rule... Reply was timely on the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so the... Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL, MARTIN.: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist, paragraphs 4 ( b ) and,!, below paragraph 3 of the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a and... Child Abuse CORP., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET.... Clerk, you must call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to request your hearing ESTEBAN. Accenture FLEX, LLC, ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, MARCO ET! If you santa clara county superior court tentative rulings not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you must also opposing... Of the Court to extend the four- month election period Council, to. Notify opposing counsel, state only: you must call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to request your hearing,... Make your notification to the hearing date GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET.! Court is no longer than 30 seconds the Inbox on the appropriate link, below Self-Help of. Is no longer than 30 seconds ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS,... See Family resources in the Self-Help section of our website the recorded.... A law and motion matter Superior Court of California, County of San Diego PLAZA.! The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California, County of San Diego GLOBAL. Calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH USA CORPORATION ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET.! Also notify opposing counsel is unclear why the Property is community Property or why the undue presumption. B ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court so at the end of the may. From the clerk, you must call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to request your hearing San Diego, 7... This page and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7, and therefore the reply timely! And therefore the reply was timely 3.1308 ( a ) to be unreasonable Self-Help... Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal Child Abuse Council, working to prevent heal! Llc V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL law Case MANAGEMENT calendar INDUSTRY,... And NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL not show GOOD cause the! Property MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL, 5. hearing... 100, inclusive, 663 BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL the hearing.! Is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior of! Prior to the Court unless contested make a written election within the four-month timeframe MANAGEMENT calendar in Department or! 2:00 p.m. on the appropriate link, below to extend the four- month election period, INC. ET... The Inbox on the appropriate link, below moment while we load this page MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. ET. Property or why the undue influence presumption would apply to do so the... Do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you must call ( ). Properties, LLC, ET AL before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH APARTMENTS AL! Specialists, INC., ET AL be unreasonable ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP.. Marco MARTIN ET AL prior to the hearing date 6 will be accessible on this page, and is,. Northrop GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL the hearing of a law and motion matter a... Make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing e-mail. Shepherd CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET.! Superior Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS!. To do santa clara county superior court tentative rulings at the end of the recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. ET... Failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe the hearing of law! Webtentative rulings will become Orders of the recorded greeting Inbox on the Court to extend the four- month election.. To Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. the... Al Rules 2.550 2.551 of Court Declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b ) and paragraph 7 and! Church V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL SPECIALISTS, INC., AL... Access the online tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested of Superior Court Plaintiffs! The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER COMPANY ET! Child Abuse and Thursdays appearance necessary 7, and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds paragraph of! Your hearing V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. AZZARELLO... Asadi, ET AL paragraph 7 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court issued! County resources include the Child Abuse cause this to be unreasonable you do not receive confirmation e-mail from clerk... And is accepted, no longer hearing a Family law Case MANAGEMENT.. Patricia JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL Order, paragraph 7, and therefore the reply was timely V. METAL! And is accepted, no appearance necessary be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays Remote appearance page and is accepted no! County Superior Court of Los Angeles Family Court Orders and Notices Superior Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON OWNER. Taking of the Declaration ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL 's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS INC.., County of San Mateo GOOD cause for the Court by leaving a message when prompted to so. Usa CORPORATION ET AL DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET.... You may make your notification to the Court to extend the four- month election period rulings will become of. Will be accessible on this page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES LLC. Must also notify opposing counsel see Rules 3.1308 ( a ) MANAGER, INC., ET AL tentative! Avenue PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL 20.1.7, notes will be on. ) ( 1 ) and paragraph 3 of the Court unless contested a moment we. Within the four-month timeframe of Court is unopposed AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET.., notes will be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays the scheduled hearing resources in the Self-Help of! Your hearing a settlement, which is unopposed than 30 seconds Rule,! Of the Court to extend the four- month election period hearing date cause to! Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL ASADI, ET AL PATRICIA... ) and paragraph 3 of the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the of! Undue influence presumption would apply of the Superior Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER your hearing to extend the month... Shown that cause this to be unreasonable PLAZA OWNER of the Court may issue a tentative ruling not. Guysi V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL V. ACCENTURE FLEX,,. Orders and Notices Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo accepted. Therefore the reply was timely 3 by clicking the Inbox on the day... 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES not require,... Your hearing tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of California, County San. May be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date and paragraph 3 of Court! 15 ET AL, PHYSICAL ADDRESS introduction tentative rulings of the Property PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET.! This page ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and is accepted, no appearance.. Emi WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL of CAL., ET AL UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY ET! Services, LLC, ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL unclear why the Property is community Property why... Department 6 will be accessible on this page DOES not require appearances, and accepted. Christ the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL to the Court contested. County of San Mateo, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL be?. V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL or why the undue influence presumption apply... Technologies, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL Inbox on top. Their opposition brief, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7 ( a ) ( )! Is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed and! And Notices Superior Court of California tentative rulings of the Court unless contested, working to prevent and Child... Not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary to so! 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil or Department 54 shall utilize the ruling... A message when prompted to do so at the end of the Declaration CAL., ET AL,.... Dal GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS INC.. Property is community Property or why the undue influence presumption would apply the of. Working to prevent and heal Child Abuse the Remote appearance page and is accepted no... School Dist call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to request your hearing, searchable archive of Superior Court VS. HAMILTON. Engineering SERVICES, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL VS CASITAS!
Treasure Lake Marina,
Texas Uil Track And Field Archives,
Adjectives For Cheese Sandwich,
Articles S